Articles, Delaware Appraisal Cases, Valuation, Valuation Cases

Highlights of 2019 Delaware Valuation Decisions

Download PDF

By Gilbert E. Matthews, CFA, Sutter Securities, Inc. (San Francisco, Calif., USA)

This year to date has been another active period for valuation cases in the Delaware courts. The Supreme Court reversed one 2018 Court of Chancery decision and affirmed another, and the Court of Chancery decided four valuation cases; these decisions are discussed below. The predominant theme is that, in arm’s-length transactions, appraisal value continues to be based primarily on the transaction price rather than on discounted cash flow.

The exhibit on page 3 shows that, since 2006, transaction price has been the dominant metric in arm’s-length transactions, while most appraisals in related party transactions have been determined using DCF. Since 2013, only one appraisal in an arm’s-length transaction (AOL Inc.1) was based on the court’s DCF calculation; the others that used DCF considered it only as confirmatory of the valuation based on transaction price.

Privacy Settings
We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy
Consent to display content from - Youtube
Consent to display content from - Vimeo
Google Maps
Consent to display content from - Google
Consent to display content from - Spotify
Sound Cloud
Consent to display content from - Sound